REGIME TYPE AND POLITICAL ACTORS 9/1/15
- Articles
- Traditional Oligarchy
- 1930s
- 1950s
- 1970s
- End of "Easy" ISI--"Hard" ISI begins--Does ISIC data support exhaustion of consumer goods imports
- Military coups in Brazil, Argentina, Chile
- Bureaucratic-authoritarianism
- Curvi-linear relation between eco. and pol. development
- 1980s
- Return to democracy
- Why?
- Cyclical
- Socio-eco. factors
- Pol. culture
- Breakdown of mil. regimes due to success (Brazil?) or failure (Argentina)?
- Economic Stages
- Export-oriented
- Political Outcome: Traditional Oligarchy
- Policies: favor landed elite and foreign capital; free trade; agrarian; repressive
- Easy Import-Substituting Industrialization (ISI)
- Political Outcome: Populism
- Policies: nationalism; favor domestic labor and entrepreneurs; multi-class; protectionism; industrialization; reform and inclusion
- Hard ISI
- Political Outcome: Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism (BA)
- Policies: military dominance (government); technocratic; internationalized business; free trade; austerity; foreign investment, exclusion
- Selected Political Actors
- Political Parties
- Chile, strong: pre- and post-Pinochet
- Argentina, strong
- Brazil, weak
- Mexico, strong
- Military
- Chile, interventionist, 1973, Pinochet
- Argentina, interventionist (quantitative)
- Brazil, interventionist (qualitative)
- Mexico, apolitical
- Labor
- Chile, moderately strong
- Argentina, strong (but Peronist)
- Brazil, subordinant
- Mexico, moderately subordinant
- Others
- Middle-Class
- Peasants
- For Review (always use sentence and paragraph format--organize)
- What is the relationship between stages of economic development and changes in regime type?
|